I liked how validation here is framed as behavior, not opinions. Pre-commitments, real conversations, and willingness to pay are far more honest signals than surveys or likes.
Glad it resonated! Looking forward to sharing more braindumps ahead. This one was directly inspired by your consistently sharp and thoughtful braindumps.
Petar, I’m fully aligned with this. One thing I’m trying to clarify is how to define a clean “go / no-go” threshold during validation.
At what point do you consider the data sufficient to make a decision either to double down or move on? For example: 500 outbound emails with 10 strong “yes” replies indicating real demand.
What do you think is a realistic and actionable goal here?
Great list! Validation and studying competitors are key for success.
Thanks Dennis! Completely agree, understanding the competitive landscape early is often underrated but crucial.
I liked how validation here is framed as behavior, not opinions. Pre-commitments, real conversations, and willingness to pay are far more honest signals than surveys or likes.
Exactly. Observing real behavior rather than relying on opinions or likes gives the clearest signal of whether an idea has true traction.
So good I Restacked it 🌟
Glad it resonated! Looking forward to sharing more braindumps ahead. This one was directly inspired by your consistently sharp and thoughtful braindumps.
Validating intent early saves time, money, and unnecessary disappointment.
Absolutely. Early intent validation can save founders from costly missteps and helps focus energy on ideas that actually have potential.
Petar, I’m fully aligned with this. One thing I’m trying to clarify is how to define a clean “go / no-go” threshold during validation.
At what point do you consider the data sufficient to make a decision either to double down or move on? For example: 500 outbound emails with 10 strong “yes” replies indicating real demand.
What do you think is a realistic and actionable goal here?