Most conversations about AI and founders focus on tools.

Which models to use. What to automate. Whether to build or buy.

I think the more interesting question is what happens when intelligence and execution stop being scarce.

If almost every ambitious founder can access extraordinary analytical and executional leverage, what actually separates the companies that matter from everyone else?

I asked Reid Hoffman, co-founder of LinkedIn, Manas AI, and Inflection AI and partner at Greylock, three questions about exactly that.

Not about tools.

Not about specific technologies.

About the fundamental shifts in what it takes to build something that matters.

His responses are presented below, followed by my takeaways on what they mean for founders.

REID HOFFMAN

Every generation of great founders is native to something. The best internet founders never had an “internet strategy” per se, they just couldn’t imagine the business any other way. People like to think everything changes about heuristics in different trend waves, but that’s not necessarily true.

I’d look for founders who see everything in an AI native way. The founders who build the most important companies of the next decade won’t have an “agent strategy”. Their first reaction to almost any problem will be, “Can my agents fix this?” And their second will be, “What would I have to give them so they could?” They assume their most capable colleagues are models, and they build the company on that foundation.

The second difference is that they natively understand, and sprint to build, learning loops. I’ve said for years that the founder with the faster OODA loop (observe, orient, decide, act) wins and the other one dies. The game has become building similar loops for the agentic infrastructure inside your organization. An AI-native company is really a set of feedback loops (product, distribution, analytics, spend) hill-climbing against an objective function 24 by 7. The founder’s job is to constantly close as many feedback loops as possible as quickly as possible, and then add leverage.

Third, they’re better allocators. That has always been the job—founders have always allocated capital and people—but an AI founder keeps three new ledgers. They allocate:

1. People: which decisions stay with humans and which get handed to the machine, and where the few people they do hire sit in the loop.

2. Context: what an agent knows determines what it can do, so context gets designed as carefully as an org chart.

3. Compute: A frontier model that costs the equivalent of $10,000 an hour belongs on the problem that deserves it, smaller models on smaller problems.

And lastly, none of this exempts you from the old rules. If anything, they matter more. A good product with great distribution has always beaten a great product with poor distribution. That continues to be true. So the AI founder also has a very strong thesis on network effects and distribution: why customers won’t leave, why they bring others, and why being first to scale (which is different than first to market) still decides winners.

PETAR DIMOV

What stands out here is that AI-native does not simply mean using more AI.

It means redesigning the company around faster learning, sharper allocation, and tighter feedback loops.

The technology may change the speed of execution, but the founder still has to decide where that speed should be pointed.

REID HOFFMAN

Fifteen years ago I said something that got quoted more than I expected, that social networks do best when they tap into one of the seven deadly sins. It was an attempt at being a bit cheeky, but the underlying point was that founders—especially in the consumer game—needed to have a deep understanding of the human beings they’re trying to serve.

Technology succeeds when it’s built on an accurate model of human beings—what people actually want, as opposed to what they say they want.

When a model can generate thousands of somewhat plausible products before breakfast, someone is going to need to figure out which one will actually build habits around. I don’t think that is a compute problem. Human needs, aspirations, and dreams are all older than the tech trend of the year. Our job as technologists and founders is to understand the gap between where humans are and where they want to go, and build technology that bridges the divide. That gets them to a meaningfully better place, and puts society on the right track.

Somewhat related, EQ is also scarce. A company is a set of relationships before it’s a set of systems, operating in a larger network of systems. When you’re starting out, you still have to get a co-founder to say yes, people to leave safe jobs and bet on you, customers to sign contracts, and investors to give you massive sums of money. In an AI world, the team is small and the leverage is enormous. So, every one of those relationships matters way more. And EQ runs inward as well: you’re the absorber of everyone else’s stress, with no one above you to vent to. Reading people, and knowing how to manage yourself, becomes a very important job.

So the short way to put it, one of the scarcest skills is understanding networks, human behavior, and people.

PETAR DIMOV

This is where the conversation shifts from capability to judgment.

If technology can produce more options, more products, and more execution at lower cost, the harder problem becomes understanding which of those possibilities actually matter to people.

That makes human behavior less like a soft skill and more like a core part of product strategy.

REID HOFFMAN

Right now, particularly as founders are more and more AI native, they need to figure out how to build trust with consumers and the market. It’s imperative for all companies to both communicate and demonstrate trustworthiness, particularly in AI where consumers are skeptical and, even more so, afraid of the effects on their jobs, livelihoods, and communities.

This could change. Companies need to demonstrate trustworthiness now, but that need becomes less important if the market decides that whatever norms are in place are enough to move forward.

Trust and speed don’t trade off the way many founders assume. Founders must take smart risks, make room for innovation along the way, and not treat cultivating trust as avoidance for launching, scaling, and innovating.

In general, people overweigh what could go wrong and underestimate what could go right, when they could be launching, gathering feedback and learning from it, iterating on it, and creating the conditions for everyone else in the market.

PETAR DIMOV

The interesting part is that Reid doesn’t frame trust as the opposite of speed.

He frames it as something founders have to build while moving quickly.

In a market where skepticism can slow adoption, the ability to earn confidence without slowing innovation becomes part of the job.

The Thread Connecting All Three

PETAR DIMOV

Reading Reid’s three answers together, something becomes clear that isn’t obvious in any single answer on its own.

In every generation of technology, the raw capability eventually becomes more accessible.

The internet gave everyone a website.

Mobile gave everyone a camera and a storefront.

AI is giving founders access to capabilities that previously required entire teams: research, coding, analysis, content, and execution.

The interesting question is what happens after access is democratized.

The founders who create important companies are not necessarily the ones who access the capability first.

They are the ones who know what to point it at.

That is the thread running through all three of Reid’s answers.

Build faster learning loops.

Understand human behavior.

Allocate people, context, and compute.

Build distribution.

Develop relationships.

Earn trust.

None of these become less important because AI becomes more capable.

In some cases, they become more important precisely because the technology is becoming more capable.

These are not secondary considerations in building a company.

In an AI-native world, they become central to the job itself.

They determine what the intelligence gets pointed at, what the company chooses to build, and whether anyone trusts what it creates.

The founders who understand this aren’t thinking about AI as a capability to adopt.

They’re thinking about it as an amplifier.

And asking themselves very carefully what, exactly, they’re amplifying.

Subscribe now

Links

Follow Reid

LinkedIn · Substack · Instagram · X · YouTube

Reid Hoffman

Website · Books · Podcasts

Follow Petar

LinkedIn · Substack · Instagram · X · YouTube

Theory of the Game

In entrepreneurship, investing, and life, you need a theory of the game. Together, we can develop ours across tech, AI, politics, and philosophy.

By Reid Hoffman

Continue Exploring the Frontier

If this piece resonated, you may want to go deeper.

This article is part of our 22nd Century Brief collection, where we explore ideas, frameworks, and strategies alongside the leaders shaping the next era of entrepreneurship and investment for the 22nd Century.

You can also explore our main topic categories to discover more insights across entrepreneurship, venture capital, fundraising, company building, and frontier technologies.

Frontier Deal Flow is a monthly curated database report within 22nd Century Frontier, connecting high-quality companies with thousands of active investors, including angels, VC funds, family offices, institutional investors, and strategic partners.

It is designed to surface signal early and improve how capital is matched with emerging opportunities.

Subscribe now

Table of Contents

1. Issue Snapshot

2. What We Cover

3. How Access Works

4. Submit For The Next Issue

5. Access The Full Report

1. Issue Snapshot

For this Frontier Deal Flow issue features 6 companies across 5 countries.

Across all 2026 editions published so far, 85 companies have been showcased.

This month’s cohort spans multiple funding stages, from Stealth / Pre-Launch to Series A, with companies developing technologies across AI, healthcare, biotechnology, blockchain, and enterprise software.

A few of the companies in this issue are working on:

• AI-powered remote monitoring designed to improve care for older women experiencing severe incontinence

• AI and blockchain infrastructure transforming indigenous cultural IP into verified digital assets and commercial opportunities

• wearable AI that turns in-person B2B sales conversations into automated CRM updates

• an African prediction market bringing real-world events and financial outcomes into a growing digital trading ecosystem

• patient-reported health data that helps pharmaceutical companies generate evidence for clinical development and commercialization

• modular SaaS tools helping Latin American small and medium-sized businesses digitize operations and automate compliance

…and more companies building at the intersection of AI, healthcare, blockchain, financial infrastructure, enterprise software, and emerging technology.

By the numbers

8 submissions received

6 companies featured

5 countries represented

Geographic mix:
North America 16.7% | Europe 16.7% | Africa 16.7% | Asia 33.3% | Latin America 16.7%

Funding stages:
Stealth / Pre-Launch 16.7% | Pre-Seed 33.3% | Seed 33.3% | Series A 16.7%

Sector coverage:
AI & Machine Learning, HealthTech, FinTech & InsurTech, Enterprise Software, Deep Tech, Blockchain & Web3, and BioTech & Life Sciences.

2. What We Cover

Each featured company includes a structured profile designed to help investors review opportunities quickly and efficiently.

Required fields

Company name
Website
Country
Sector
Stage
Contact information
Investment deck

Investor signals

Amount raising
Traction summary
Revenue or growth metrics
Previous investors
Fundraising deadline
One-line pitch

3. How Access Works

Frontier Deal Flow is shared in two formats.

1. Paid subscribers receive the full report, including:

company contact details

downloadable pitch decks

full investor signals and metrics

This version is available immediately below, giving investors time to review the companies and reach out directly to the ones they are interested in.

2. A limited version will be released two weeks later, and shared with the broader readership.

   This version will include the company list, but without contact details, decks, investor signals, or metrics.

The goal is to maintain strong signal for investors while still showcasing frontier innovation to the wider community.

4. Submit For The Next Issue

Founders who would like to be included in Frontier Deal Flow: November 2026, published on 1 December, can submit their company here:

Frontier Deal Flow Submission Form

Submissions are completely FREE.

5. Access The Full Report

Subscribe to unlock access to:

✅ All premium resources

✅ Full archive

✅ Future Frontier Deal Flow issues

And more.

Get 10% off forever

Unlock the full Frontier Deal Flow below 👇

Read more

Enterprise Members are companies supporting 22nd Century Frontier and actively building, investing, and operating at the intersection of technology, entrepreneurship, capital, and long-term value creation.

Enterprise Members

• EuphoriaTech Group is a London-based tech consortium uniting Ventures, Advisory, and Media to fuel innovation. Through venture building, strategy, acquisitions, and media, it empowers businesses and founders to shape the future.

Interested in joining the Enterprise Members program?

Learn more about the Enterprise Plan

Our May Most Loved Articles

Chosen by you. Ranked by reader engagement. Listed in reverse order.

5

Database Report by 22nd Century Frontier

4

Dr. Robert Cialdini on the psychology of influence, the ethics of persuasion, and building trust in an AI-driven world

3

Guy Kawasaki on building remarkable products, navigating uncertainty, and creating companies people believe in

2

Premium Resource: A practical step-by-step process, complete with a research checklist, outreach templates, and a simple contact prioritization system

1

Public Version by 22nd Century Frontier

Subscribe now

Thank you

To every reader, paid and free subscriber, collaborator, and partner who spent time with us this month, thank you.

Your comments, shares, and trust are exactly what lets us keep producing original insight and useful resources.

We are currently in week 44 of 2026 (Q4).

Wishing you a productive November full of momentum, focus, and meaningful progress.

WHY SUBSCRIBE | PREMIUM RESOURCES | ENTERPRISE PLAN | SPONSOR

You need to reach the right investors, get their attention, and give them enough confidence to take the next step.

For many founders, the first challenge is getting a meeting.

You might have identified 30 funds that invest in your sector and stage.

You might even have several partners in mind.

But if you have no relationship with them, how do you get through?

The obvious answer is to send an email.

Sometimes, that works.

But when you have limited time and a finite number of opportunities to make a strong first impression, relying on unsolicited outreach alone is a poor strategy.

A credible introduction can do something a cold email cannot:

The trick is knowing how to get one.

Here is how to approach it.

Frontier Deal Flow Submission Form

Key takeaways

1. Relevance beats reputation.

   Target investors who fit your business, not simply the ones with the biggest names.

2. A mutual connection is not necessarily an introduction.

   The strength of the relationship matters more than the number of shared contacts.

3. Make it easy for people to help you.

   Explain why the investor is a fit and provide a concise message they can confidently forward.

4. Protect the relationships you already have.

   Ask whether someone is well placed to introduce you, and make it easy for them to say no.

5. A warm introduction is an advantage, not a requirement.

   If no credible route exists, a specific, well-researched direct approach can still open the door.

Table of Contents

1. Start With the Investor, Not Your Contact List

2. Find the Person Who Can Actually Open the Door

3. Understand What Makes an Introduction Valuable

4. Ask for an Introduction Without Putting Your Contact in an Awkward Position

5. Give the Intermediary Something Useful to Forward

6. What If You Cannot Get an Introduction?

7. Build Your Network Before You Need Capital

8. The Practical Playbook for Getting a VC Introduction

9. Your Action Plan

1. Start With the Investor, Not Your Contact List

Founders often begin fundraising by building a list of investors and asking everyone they know for introductions.

That approach gets the process backwards.

Before contacting anyone, understand who you want to meet and why.

Does the fund invest at your stage?

Does it have experience in your sector?

Has it backed companies with a similar business model?

Does the partner you are targeting actually lead investments, or do they focus on a different part of the market?

A fund’s reputation is not enough.

You need a reason to believe there is a fit.

Imagine you are building an enterprise cybersecurity company.

A former founder you know has a close relationship with a partner at a fund that recently invested in several enterprise software businesses.

That is potentially a useful connection.

Compare it with an introduction to a famous investor whose portfolio consists almost entirely of consumer brands and early-stage marketplaces.

The second investor may have a bigger name.

The first may be a much better fit.

Start with a focused list of funds and individual partners.

Research their investment criteria, relevant portfolio companies, and recent activity. Then identify the strongest possible route to each person.

The quality of your targeting determines the quality of your outreach.

2. Find the Person Who Can Actually Open the Door

Once you know which investor you want to reach, look for people who know them.

Your existing network is the obvious starting point, but do not limit yourself to friends, former colleagues, or other founders you know personally.

Look at the investor’s portfolio.

Founders whose companies they have backed may be well placed to introduce you.

So might senior executives at those companies, other investors who have worked alongside the fund, or advisers who have an established relationship with the partner.

Suppose you are raising a Series A for a logistics software company.

You discover that your target investor backed a business operating in an adjacent market.

You also find that its COO previously worked with someone on your founding team.

That connection might be more useful than a distant acquaintance who happens to know the investor socially.

The goal is to find a person who can credibly explain why the investor should speak with you.

But there is an important distinction here.

Knowing someone is not the same as being able to introduce them meaningfully.

A person might have hundreds of LinkedIn connections and still have little influence with the partner you are trying to reach.

Someone with a much smaller network might speak with that partner every week.

The relationship matters more than the connection count.

3. Understand What Makes an Introduction Valuable

An introduction is not valuable simply because another person forwards your email.

Its value comes from the confidence the intermediary can transfer.

Think about what happens when an investor receives a message from someone they respect.

They already have a reason to take the recommendation seriously.

They may still reject the opportunity, but the founder has earned a more informed first look.

Now consider an introduction from someone the investor barely knows, who offers no meaningful context and cannot explain why the opportunity is relevant.

Technically, it is a warm introduction.

In practice, it may offer very little advantage over direct outreach.

There are three questions worth asking about any potential intermediary:

• Relationship: How well do they know the investor? Have they worked together, invested together, or built a meaningful professional relationship?

• Credibility: Does the investor respect their judgment, particularly when it comes to evaluating companies?

• Relevance: Can they explain why your business fits this particular investor?

The strongest introductions tend to combine all three.

You will not always find someone who scores highly on every dimension.

That is fine.

The point is to assess the relationship before relying on it.

Do not confuse a recognizable name with a credible recommendation.

4. Ask for an Introduction Without Putting Your Contact in an Awkward Position

Founders sometimes approach introductions as if they are asking for a small administrative favour.

They send a pitch deck, mention the investor’s name, and ask their contact to pass it along.

The problem is that this leaves the intermediary with all the work.

They have to decide whether the company is worth recommending, whether the investor is a good fit, and what they should say.

If they are not convinced, they may avoid responding altogether.

Make the decision easier.

Explain why you are targeting that investor, give a concise overview of the business, and ask whether your contact feels comfortable making the introduction.

You want someone who genuinely believes the introduction is worth making, not someone who feels pressured into forwarding your details.

5. Give the Intermediary Something Useful to Forward

Once someone agrees to introduce you, do not make them write your pitch from scratch.

Prepare a short, forwardable paragraph that they can use with minimal editing.

It should explain what the company does, the problem it solves, the evidence that it is working, and why you are reaching out.

Specific evidence is more useful than grand claims.

If you have meaningful traction, include it.

Depending on your business, that might mean revenue growth, retention, customer adoption, margins, or a particularly strong commercial partnership.

If you are pre-revenue, explain what you have validated and what makes the opportunity compelling.

The purpose is not to close the investment in an email.

It is to earn a serious first conversation.

6. What If You Cannot Get an Introduction?

Sometimes you will not have a credible connection.

That does not mean you should abandon the investor.

It means you need to make a deliberate decision about how to approach them directly.

First, check whether the fund has a clear submission process.

If it does, follow the instructions and make your submission specific to the fund’s investment criteria.

You can also consider a concise email to the relevant partner, particularly when you have a clear reason for contacting them.

The message should be short, relevant, and supported by evidence.

Explain why you chose them, what your company does, and why the opportunity may fit their investment focus.

Avoid generic messages sent to dozens of investors.

Do not pretend to have a connection you do not have.

And do not repeatedly follow up after receiving no response.

A lack of introduction is not an excuse for poor outreach.

Nor should you treat a warm introduction as a guarantee of a meeting or investment.

A strong connection can get your opportunity considered.

It cannot make the business attractive if the underlying fundamentals are weak.

The best approach depends on the investor, the opportunity, and the strength of your evidence.

Use your time accordingly.

7. Build Your Network Before You Need Capital

The most useful fundraising relationships are often built well before a fundraising process begins.

If the first time you contact another founder is when you need access to their investor, your relationship has an obvious imbalance.

Instead, build genuine connections with founders working in adjacent markets.

Stay in touch with investors who understand your sector.

Share useful information, make introductions when appropriate, and develop relationships without treating every interaction as a transaction.

This does not mean spending your days networking instead of building your company.

It means being intentional about the relationships that could become valuable over time.

A founder who knows your work, understands your progress, and has seen how you operate is in a much better position to recommend you than someone who received your first message yesterday.

The same applies to investors.

You do not need to cultivate a relationship with every fund you might approach in the future.

But if there are a few investors who are particularly relevant to your business, it can be worth establishing contact before you need a cheque.

Share progress when you have something meaningful to report.

Ask thoughtful questions.

Demonstrate that you understand their investment focus.

Fundraising becomes easier when it is not the first time the other person has heard of you.

8. The Practical Playbook for Getting a VC Introduction

Want to turn this into a repeatable fundraising process?

Paid subscribers get the practical playbook:

How to map your connections to target investors, assess which introductions are worth pursuing, approach potential introducers, and give them a message they can confidently forward.

Below you get the practical process I would use to work through this, including the research checklist, outreach templates, and a simple way to prioritize your contacts.

Upgrade to access the full guide and start building your introduction pipeline.

Read more

Influence is more than a communication skill.

It shapes how we make decisions, build trust, and create companies people want to follow.

We like to believe that we make decisions based on facts.

We compare options, weigh the evidence, and choose what makes the most sense.

But how often do we actually do that?

A recommendation from someone we respect, the feeling that an opportunity is slipping away, or the simple fact that someone makes us feel understood can change our minds before we have fully considered the facts.

We tend to notice the arguments we use to justify a decision more easily than the forces that shaped it.

That gap between how rational we think we are and how we actually behave has enormous consequences for founders, leaders, and anyone trying to earn another person’s trust.

I sat down with Dr. Robert Cialdini, widely known as the godfather of influence and the author of Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion, a book that earned extraordinary praise from two of the greatest investors of all time.

Charlie Munger frequently called it his number one book recommendation, while Warren Buffett ranked it among the best business books of all time.

In our conversation, we explored the psychology behind persuasion, the ethics of getting people to say yes, and what happens when AI learns to do it at scale.

What We Discuss

• The principles behind influence

• How founders can build influence without money, status, or an established network

• What AI gets wrong when it tries to optimize persuasion

• The mistakes founders and executives make when persuading others

• Why the human side of decision-making will remain important even as technology changes.

Watch The Full Conversation

The Lessons

1. People Don’t Make Decisions the Way They Think They Do

Intelligence can help us analyze a decision.

It doesn’t make us immune to the psychological forces surrounding it.

As Cialdini explained, facts and logic matter, but they are often “swamped by how we feel” and the rapport we have with the person making the request.

For founders, this matters more than we might think.

You can have the better product, the stronger argument, and the more convincing spreadsheet, yet still lose to someone who has earned more trust.

When we face too many options, we also rely on shortcuts.

We look to experts, notice what people like us are choosing, or respond to scarcity.

These signals help us navigate complexity, but they can also lead us toward the wrong decision.

The goal isn’t to eliminate the emotional side of decision-making.

It’s to understand how it shapes our choices and the choices of the people we serve.

2. Empathy Is a Business Advantage, Not Just a Personal Virtue

It’s easy to approach a customer conversation by thinking about what we want them to understand.

It’s harder to start with their priorities, frustrations, constraints, and definition of value.

That difference changes everything about how we communicate.

A pitch that makes perfect sense to a founder may mean very little to a customer who doesn’t share the same assumptions.

A product feature that took months to build may be irrelevant to someone trying to solve a much simpler problem.

Empathy helps close that gap.

There is a practical consequence, too: rapport often needs to come before persuasion.

Human connection can change the outcome.

For a startup, this is a reminder to make digital experiences feel human.

Before asking someone to move in your direction, give them a reason to feel understood.

3. Unethical Persuasion Is a Hiring Problem, Too

“Fake it till you make it” has a certain appeal in startup culture.

Founders need to sell a vision before it becomes reality.

But there is a difference between communicating an ambitious vision and deceiving people to get what you want.

When I asked whether someone who has compromised their ethics can regain trust, Cialdini’s answer was direct: admit the mistake, explain what went wrong, and show what has changed so it won’t happen again.

That principle applies to more than public apologies.

It points to the kind of company a founder is building.

Cialdini described research linking unethical workplace cultures to employee stress, the departure of good employees, and a greater tolerance for cheating among those who remain.

His description of the last consequence stuck with me: “You’ve selected for cheaters.”

A culture built around deception can gradually reward the very behavior that makes a company less trustworthy.

Trust isn’t just a brand asset.

It’s an operating advantage that influences who joins, who stays, and how people work together.

A founder’s values are revealed not only by what they say publicly, but by what the company rewards when nobody is watching.

4. AI Can Make Persuasion More Powerful. That Doesn’t Make It More Ethical.

AI can generate sales copy, personalize messages, and suggest ways to make an argument more compelling.

That creates real opportunities for businesses, especially smaller teams with limited resources.

But there is a serious risk: a persuasive recommendation can be built on false evidence.

Cialdini described asking large language models for advice on marketing or sales and receiving claims about what works that may be false.

The risk is not simply that AI makes mistakes.

It’s that those mistakes can be packaged as evidence for influencing someone else.

A message can be optimized for conversion while being misleading about why someone should say yes.

His proposed distinction is important.

Instead of asking AI for the most persuasive way to present an offer, ask what genuine evidence already exists.

Is the product actually scarce?

Is there real social proof?

Does the recommendation come from a credible authority?

Use AI to communicate real value more effectively, not to manufacture the appearance of value.

As polished messaging becomes easier to produce at scale, credibility becomes more valuable.

The technology may change how influence works, but it doesn’t remove our responsibility for what we persuade people to believe.

5. If You’re Starting From Zero, Start With Their Interests

What if you’re twenty years old, with no network, no reputation, and no capital? How do you create opportunities?

Cialdini returned to a principle associated with Benjamin Franklin:

“Should you wish to persuade, speak not to logical argument. Speak to the self-interest of your audience.”

That doesn’t mean reducing every interaction to money or personal gain.

People care about their reputation, their values, their relationships, and the kind of person they believe themselves to be.

The practical question is: what would make this genuinely valuable to the other person?

This is also where influence and empathy meet.

You cannot understand another person’s interests by assuming they are the same as yours.

And there is a final principle that ties the conversation together: Liking.

People are more likely to move in the direction of someone with whom they feel rapport, familiarity, and trust.

That is not a trick to deploy at the end of a sales process. It is something to build into the relationship from the beginning.

For anyone starting without advantages, that is encouraging.

You may not be able to manufacture a reputation overnight, but you can be useful, curious, reliable, and genuinely interested in the people you meet.

Those are foundations worth building on.

Timestamps

00:00 Introducing Dr. Robert Cialdini

01:23 The Surprises Hidden Inside Human Behavior

02:39 The Intelligence Trap

05:28 The Hidden Power of Influence

06:37 The Ethics of Persuasion

12:05 From Persuasion to Trust

15:07 The Influence Principles Every Founder Should Know

21:23 The Persuasion Mistakes Leaders Keep Making

23:22 When Machines Learn to Persuade Us

25:54 The Human Tendencies Technology Will Amplify

28:35 How to Build Influence From Nothing

30:57 The Giants Who Shaped Us

32:19 The Principles That Will Survive 100 Years

33:17 Continue the Journey

Links

Dr. Robert Cialdini and the Cialdini Institute have made the following available to our audience:

▪️Complimentary Influence Profile Assessment

▪️20% off the Cialdini Certified Practitioner program

Use code 22CENTURY for both offers.

Follow Dr. Robert Cialdini

LinkedIn · Facebook · Instagram · X · YouTube

Cialdini Institute · Influence at Work · Newsletter · Books

Follow Petar Dimov

LinkedIn · Substack · Instagram · X · YouTube

Final Thought

The more I think about influence, the less I see it as a way to get people to say yes.

I see it as a responsibility to understand why they might say yes in the first place.

For founders, that distinction matters.

You can use psychology to win a transaction, or you can use it to build a relationship that lasts beyond the transaction.

As AI makes persuasion easier to produce and distribute, the difference between those two approaches will matter even more.

The question isn’t only whether you can influence people.

It’s whether they will still trust you when they understand how you did it.

Continue Exploring the Frontier

If this piece resonated, you may want to go deeper.

This article is part of our 22nd Century Frontier Show collection, where we explore ideas, frameworks, and strategies alongside the leaders shaping the next era of entrepreneurship and investment for the 22nd Century.

You can also explore our main topic categories to discover more insights across entrepreneurship, venture capital, fundraising, company building, and frontier technologies.

Frontier Deal Flow is a monthly curated database report within 22nd Century Frontier, connecting high-quality companies with active investors across frontier technologies and emerging markets.

This limited edition showcases the companies featured in the September 2026 issue, while preserving the signal and structure that make the report valuable.

Subscribe now

Table of Contents

1. Issue Snapshot

2. Featured Companies

3. Submit For The Next Issue

4. Access The Full Report

1. Issue Snapshot

The September 2026 Frontier Deal Flow features 4 companies across 2 countries.

Across all 2026 editions published so far, 79 companies have been showcased.

This month’s cohort spans Pre-Seed and Seed, with a strong concentration in AI-driven businesses across financial services, healthcare, commerce, and media.

By the numbers

5 submissions received

4 companies featured

2 countries represented

Geographic mix:
North America 100%

Stage distribution:
Pre-Seed 50% | Seed 50%

AI exposure:
AI & Machine Learning appears in 75% of the featured cohort

Sector spread:
AI & Machine Learning, FinTech & InsurTech, HealthTech, E-Commerce, Media, Entertainment & Gaming

2. Featured Companies

The full version, available to paid subscribers, includes company contact details, downloadable pitch decks, investor signals, and additional fundraising information.

Below is the curated list of companies included in this public version.

Access Report: Public Version

3. Submit For The Next Issue

Founders who would like to be included in Frontier Deal Flow: October 2026, published on 2 November, can submit their company here:

Frontier Deal Flow Submission Form

Submissions are completely FREE.

4. Access The Full Report

The full version of Frontier Deal Flow includes:

• company contact details

• downloadable pitch decks

• full investor signals and metrics

To unlock the complete database and future issues, upgrade below.

Get 10% off forever

WHY SUBSCRIBE | PREMIUM RESOURCES | ENTERPRISE PLAN | ADVERTISE

Find the right market.

Back the right founder.

Make the right decision.

Pick the right technology.

Guy Kawasaki has spent decades around some of the biggest companies and entrepreneurs in technology.

His view is more grounded:

The information is never perfect.

You can have more data, better technology, and increasingly powerful AI tools.

At some point, you still have to make a decision without knowing exactly how it will turn out.

Guy joined me for the first episode of 22nd Century Frontier to talk about startups, Apple, Canva, AI, venture capital, behavioral economics, product design, and what entrepreneurship might still look like a century from now.

The conversation kept coming back to one idea:

Stop trying to predict the future perfectly.

Build something useful, make your best decision, and then make that decision work.

What We Discuss

• Why successful companies can lose sight of the responsibility that comes with success

• Why user experience is still one of the most neglected parts of building a company

• What separates a product people buy from one they become evangelists for

• Why AI may make building products easier while making differentiation harder

• What founders and investors get wrong about predicting winners

Watch The Full Conversation

The Lessons

1. Success creates responsibility

One of Guy’s more pointed observations was about what happens after a company succeeds.

He has watched companies begin with idealistic ambitions to improve people’s creativity and productivity, only to become increasingly focused on making more money.

His view is straightforward:

“It seems to me that the more successful you are, the more you owe to society.”

For founders, that is a useful question to ask before success arrives.

What will you do with the leverage that comes from building something people actually want?

Guy’s answers are practical rather than philosophical:

Pay employees more, contribute to causes, and use the company as an example of putting broader interests ahead of your own.

Growth creates options.

It also creates obligations.

2. The product should survive contact with a real human being

Guy repeatedly returned to something surprisingly basic:

Use your own product.

He described an app for tracking travel that did not allow users to edit a flight. If plans changed, the user had to delete the original record and create a new one.

The obvious question is the one every founder should be asking:

Would I tolerate this?

The same criticism applies to products built by enormous companies.

The lesson is bigger than UX.

Founders spend enormous amounts of time thinking about fundraising, hiring, growth and strategy.

It is easy to forget that customers experience none of those things.

They experience the product.

3. A company becomes a movement when the product becomes part of someone’s life

Guy’s definition of product love is particularly useful.

He describes the Macintosh as something that “extends you, amplifies you, accelerates you, it improves you.”

That is a different standard from customer acquisition.

A customer buys something because it solves a problem.

An evangelist talks about it because the product has become part of how they operate.

He saw this happen at Canva.

In the early days, the team would watch new users arrive, celebrating when hundreds of people signed up in a day.

The important signal was not simply revenue.

It was uptake.

Macintosh user groups, Harley Davidson communities and Tesla owners all illustrate the same phenomenon:

People voluntarily organize around products that matter to them.

And there is an interesting corollary.

Guy would rather have people love a product and some people hate it than have everyone simply ignore it.

Indifference is the real problem.

4. AI is making creation easier. That makes uniqueness harder.

Guy is enthusiastic about AI as a building tool.

He has used vibe coding to create applications despite having no engineering background. For him, that changes who gets to build.

But there is a second-order problem.

If everyone can build faster, building alone is no longer much of a moat.

Guy currently uses Gemini, Claude and ChatGPT for different tasks. He finds all three valuable, but says he does not feel strong loyalty to any of them.

That is the challenge for AI companies.

“But are they unique? Hmm.”

For founders, the implication is important.

AI can reduce the cost of creating a product.

It does not automatically create a reason for customers to choose yours.

Guy uses a two-by-two matrix to think about this:

Products can be valuable or not valuable, and unique or not unique.

The interesting territory is where both meet.

His example is the original iPod.

It was not simply a music player.

It combined capacity, usability, legal access to music, pricing and Apple’s ecosystem in a way competing products did not.

That is what made it difficult to substitute.

5. Nobody knows the future. Take your best shot.

Guy is skeptical of the mythology surrounding venture capital.

He argues that investors often explain their successful investments as though they were obvious in advance, while failures get rationalized away.

His metaphor is memorable:

“You can always hit the bullseye if you paint the bullseye after you see what’s stuck in the wall.”

There is no perfect dataset, model or investment thesis that removes uncertainty.

The same principle applies to founders.

Guy’s surfing analogy captures it better than any business framework.

You can make the wrong decision about a wave and still find a way to ride it.

That leads to perhaps the most useful idea in the conversation:

Don’t obsess over making the perfect decision. Focus on making your decision right.

You will never have complete information.

You still have to act.

And there is one principle Guy believes could survive another hundred years:

“You should never ask people to do something that you yourself would not want to do.”

Technology will change.

Markets will change.

Products will change.

That test probably won’t.

Timestamps

00:00 Introducing Guy Kawasaki

01:06 Myths and Realities of Startup Success

03:41 What Entrepreneurs Should Optimize For Besides Growth

07:51 Remarkable Use of AI in Product and Code Generation

09:20 From Customer Acquisition to Building Believers

13:43 Starting Over in Silicon Valley Today

15:21 The Influence of Psychology and Behavioral Economics

17:07 Crazy Ideas That Will Be Obvious in the Future

19:04 Silicon Valley's Unique Culture and Its Future

20:31 The Second Half of the 21st Century and AI Startups

22:19 The Reality of Investing in Unproven Startups

25:37 The Importance of Unique and Valuable Products

29:23 The Commoditization of AI Tools

35:24 The Value of Personal Preparation and Research

39:38 Influences of Steve Jobs and Jane Goodall

41:04 Personal Goals and Continuous Improvement

44:29 Timeless Principles of Entrepreneurship

Links

Follow Guy

LinkedIn · Substack · Instagram · X · YouTube

Guy Kawasaki

Website · Remarkable People Podcast · Books

Follow Petar

LinkedIn · Substack · Instagram · X · YouTube

Guy has also made his book Everybody Has Something to Hide available as a free download. You can access it directly from his website.

Remarkable People

Become remarkable. Podcast interviews, essays, how-tos, and lessons from my work at Apple, Canva, Google, Wikipedia and Mercedes plus interviews of remarkable people such as Jane Goodall, Woz, Carol Dweck, Seth Godin, and Bob Cialdini.

By Guy Kawasaki

Final Thought

Guy doesn’t pretend to know what comes next.

That’s part of the point.

You don’t need perfect information.

You need something worth building, enough humility to listen to the people using it, and the willingness to make your decision right after you have made it.

Continue Exploring the Frontier

If this piece resonated, you may want to go deeper.

This article is part of our 22nd Century Frontier Show collection, where we explore ideas, frameworks, and strategies alongside the leaders shaping the next era of entrepreneurship and investment for the 22nd Century.

You can also explore our main topic categories to discover more insights across entrepreneurship, venture capital, fundraising, company building, and frontier technologies.

Frontier Deal Flow is a monthly curated database report within 22nd Century Frontier, connecting high-quality companies with thousands of active investors, including angels, VC funds, family offices, institutional investors, and strategic partners.

It is designed to surface signal early and improve how capital is matched with emerging opportunities.

Watch the Premiere

Table of Contents

1. Issue Snapshot

2. What We Cover

3. How Access Works

4. Submit For The Next Issue

5. Access The Full Report

1. Issue Snapshot

For this Frontier Deal Flow issue features 4 companies across 2 countries.

Across all 2026 editions published so far, 79 companies have been showcased.

This month’s cohort spans Pre-Seed and Seed, with a strong concentration in AI-driven businesses across financial services, healthcare, commerce, and media.

A few of the companies in this issue are working on:

• AI agents and deterministic underwriting for private-market capital allocation

• agentic video infrastructure turning live events into personalized, distributed content

• a social media marketplace using patent-pending incentives to reward measurable real-world impact

• AI-powered adaptive diabetes care connecting personalized patient support with health-system workflows

…and more companies building at the intersection of AI, finance, healthcare, media, and emerging technology.

By the numbers

5 submissions received

4 companies featured

2 countries represented

Geographic mix:
North America 100%

Most common stages:
Pre-Seed, Seed
(Pre-Seed 50% | Seed 50%)

AI exposure:
AI & Machine Learning appears in 75% of the featured cohort

Sector spread:
AI & Machine Learning, FinTech & InsurTech, HealthTech, E-Commerce, Media, Entertainment & Gaming

2. What We Cover

Each featured company includes a structured profile designed to help investors review opportunities quickly and efficiently.

Required fields

Company name
Website
Country
Sector
Stage
Contact information
Investment deck

Investor signals

Amount raising
Traction summary
Revenue or growth metrics
Previous investors
Fundraising deadline
One-line pitch

3. How Access Works

Frontier Deal Flow is shared in two formats.

1. Paid subscribers receive the full report, including:

company contact details

downloadable pitch decks

full investor signals and metrics

This version is available immediately below, giving investors time to review the companies and reach out directly to the ones they are interested in.

2. A limited version will be released two weeks later, and shared with the broader readership.

   This version will include the company list, but without contact details, decks, investor signals, or metrics.

The goal is to maintain strong signal for investors while still showcasing frontier innovation to the wider community.

4. Submit For The Next Issue

Founders who would like to be included in Frontier Deal Flow: October 2026, published on 2 November, can submit their company here:

Frontier Deal Flow Submission Form

Submissions are completely FREE.

5. Access The Full Report

Subscribe to unlock access to:

✅ All premium resources

✅ Full archive

✅ Future Frontier Deal Flow issues

And more.

Get 10% off forever

Unlock the full Frontier Deal Flow below 👇

Read more

Enterprise Members are companies supporting 22nd Century Frontier and actively building, investing, and operating at the intersection of technology, entrepreneurship, capital, and long-term value creation.

Enterprise Members

• EuphoriaTech Group is a London-based tech consortium uniting Ventures, Advisory, and Media to fuel innovation. Through venture building, strategy, acquisitions, and media, it empowers businesses and founders to shape the future.

Interested in joining the Enterprise Members program?

Learn more about the Enterprise Plan

Our May Most Loved Articles

Chosen by you. Ranked by reader engagement. Listed in reverse order.

6

A new show about the people building what comes next. Here’s how to join the premiere

5

The best introductions create momentum. The wrong ones create obligation

4

Public Version by 22nd Century Frontier

3

Your subject line does not need to shout. It needs to tell an investor why the email is worth opening

2

Database Report by 22nd Century Frontier

1

Social proof can open a door. A credibility gap can close the whole building

Subscribe now

Thank you

To every reader, paid and free subscriber, collaborator, and partner who spent time with us this month, thank you.

Your comments, shares, and trust are exactly what lets us keep producing original insight and useful resources.

We are currently in week 40 (end of Q3 / start of Q4) of 2026.

Wishing you a productive October full of momentum, focus, and meaningful progress.

WHY SUBSCRIBE | PREMIUM RESOURCES | ENTERPRISE PLAN | ADVERTISE

Some became mentors.

Some became friends.

Some I only met once, but that one conversation changed how I thought about everything that came after.

Those meetings taught me something I couldn’t have learned any other way.

Not from books.

Not from courses.

From the people actually building the future, while everyone else was still trying to understand the present.

I kept thinking:

What if more people had access to that?

That’s why I created the 22nd Century Frontier Show.

What It Is

Video conversations with the founders, investors, and executives shaping the next era of entrepreneurship and investment.

The show will be available on YouTube, Spotify, Apple Podcasts, and here on Substack.

Subscribe on YouTube to follow the show and make sure you don’t miss Episode 1.

Join The Premiere

The first guest is Guy Kawasaki.

From Apple’s original Macintosh team to Canva, from venture capital to working with founders and startups around the world, few people have seen more of what building something remarkable actually requires.

Episode 1 launches 6th October 2026.

The first episode goes live as a YouTube premiere on Tuesday 6th October at 6 PM London / 1 PM New York / 10 AM San Francisco.

👥 Join the LinkedIn event to get reminded and connect with other attendees.

If this is the kind of conversation you’ve been looking for, I’ll see you there.

Petar

Subscribe on YouTube and join us for Episode 1 on October 6.

It sounds obvious.

It is also surprisingly rare.

Someone forwards an email, adds two people to a thread, writes “thought you two should meet” and considers the job done.

The problem is that the introduction has now become an obligation for everyone else.

One person has to decide whether to take the meeting.

The other has to work out why they are there.

Both are now managing the social expectation created by the person who made the introduction.

That is not networking.

That is outsourcing your awkwardness to other people.

Frontier Deal Flow Submission Form

Key takeaways

1. A good introduction starts with permission, not assumption.

2. Your network is built on trust, and every introduction spends some of that social capital.

3. Context matters. People should know who they are meeting and why the connection makes sense.

4. A bad introduction can waste time and make both sides uncomfortable, while a well-made one creates immediate value.

5. The best connectors do not make the most introductions. They make the most relevant ones.

Table of Contents

1. An Introduction Is Not Yours To Give Away

2. The Person Making The Introduction Has Incomplete Information

3. Context Is Part Of The Introduction

4. Your Network Is Not A Contact Database

5. The Cost Of A Bad Introduction Is Asymmetric

6. There Are Exceptions

7. Good Connectors Protect Both Sides

8. The Simple Rule

1. An Introduction Is Not Yours To Give Away

People treat introductions like they are free.

They are not.

An introduction spends someone else’s time, attention and social capital.

Imagine you know a founder building a cybersecurity company and an investor who has previously backed similar businesses.

You could put them together immediately.

Or you could send two short messages.

To the investor:

Then ask the founder the same question.

If both say yes, make the connection.

That tiny extra step changes everything.

Nobody is being ambushed.

Nobody has to invent an excuse.

Most importantly, both people arrive with some expectation of why the conversation is happening.

That is a much better starting point.

2. The Person Making The Introduction Has Incomplete Information

One reason bad introductions happen is that people assume they know what others want.

Usually, they do not.

Your investor contact may have stopped investing in fintech six months ago.

Your founder contact may have just closed a round.

Your former colleague may have moved into a completely different role.

A person who was perfect for an introduction last year may be completely wrong for it today.

People change.

Priorities change.

Strategies change.

The connector often knows the least about those changes.

This is why a sentence like “I thought you two should talk” is not enough.

Why should they talk?

What is the specific reason?

What does each person get from the conversation?

If you cannot answer those questions clearly, you probably should not make the introduction yet.

3. Context Is Part Of The Introduction

Even when both people have agreed to meet, the introduction can still be poor.

A useful introduction should do three things quickly:

Explain who each person is.

Explain why the connection makes sense.

Give enough context that neither person has to start with “So, what do you do?”

For example:

That is enough.

No biography.

No twelve-paragraph life story.

Just enough signal to make the conversation easier.

The introduction should remove friction, not create more of it.

Ready to become one of our 100 Founding Members?

Subscribe now

4. Your Network Is Not A Contact Database

A lot of people approach networking as if the value sits in the size of their address book.

It does not.

The value sits in the quality of the relationships inside it.

If you become known for sending random introductions, people start protecting themselves.

They stop replying quickly.

They become hesitant when your name appears in their inbox.

Eventually, even your genuinely valuable introductions become harder to trust.

That is an unnecessary own goal.

A strong network is not one where you can reach thousands of people.

It is one where, when you make an introduction, the other person trusts that you have a reason for doing it.

That is social capital.

And like financial capital, it can be spent badly.

5. The Cost Of A Bad Introduction Is Asymmetric

Read more

Founders experiment with subject lines, emojis, urgency, clever hooks, exaggerated claims, unusual formatting, and, increasingly, RANDOM CAPITAL LETTERS.

Please stop.

An investor does not need your email to scream at them.

They need to understand what you are building, whether it fits their mandate, and whether there is enough substance to justify spending time on it.

That is a much lower bar than many founders seem to think.

And it is a much more useful one.

Frontier Deal Flow Submission Form

Key takeaways

1. Investor outreach is not a competition for attention. It is a test of credibility.

2. Clear facts beat hype. Traction, stage, sector, geography, and round size tell investors more than clever language ever will.

3. A subject line should help an investor decide whether the opportunity is relevant, not manufacture urgency.

4. If you need tricks to get someone interested, the underlying proposition probably needs more work.

5. The best fundraising emails are short, specific, easy to understand, and easy to forward.

Table of Contents

1. You Are Not Trying To Win The Inbox

2. Investors Already Know Every Trick

3. Tell The Investor What They Need To Know

4. Metrics Are More Persuasive Than Adjectives

5. Do Not Make Investors Work To Decode Your Company

6. There Is A Difference Between Categorising And Shouting

7. Your Email Cannot Fix A Weak Proposition

8. Make The First Email Easy To Forward

9. Conclusion: Stop Optimising The Wrong Thing

1. You Are Not Trying To Win The Inbox

The purpose of an investor email is not to produce a high open rate.

It is to start a useful conversation.

That distinction matters.

An investor might open a subject line because it says:

URGENT: MASSIVE AI OPPORTUNITY YOU CANNOT MISS

But what happens next?

They discover a two-year-old company with little traction, a vague description, and a long paragraph about how the market is going to be worth $100bn.

You got the open.

You lost the investor.

The better question is:

Try something like:

Enterprise security platform. $1.2m seed. UK-based.

Nothing clever.

But an investor immediately knows what it is, what stage it is, the geography, and roughly what they are being asked to look at.

That is useful.

And useful beats clever.

2. Investors Already Know Every Trick

Investors see fundraising emails constantly.

They have seen the “revolutionary” company.

They have seen the “Uber of X”.

They have seen the “once-in-a-generation opportunity”.

They have seen “AI-powered” attached to products where AI is barely relevant.

They have seen subject lines with five exclamation marks and every important word capitalised.

None of this creates credibility.

In fact, it often does the opposite.

The more sophisticated the investor, the faster they tend to recognise manufactured urgency.

This is important because founders sometimes optimise for attention when they should be optimising for confidence.

Those are different things.

Attention says:

Look at me.

Confidence says:

Here is the information. Decide for yourself.

The second one is far more powerful when you are asking someone to invest serious money.

3. Tell The Investor What They Need To Know

A good subject line does one job.

It provides enough information for the investor to decide whether the email is relevant.

That usually means some combination of:

What is it?

What stage is it?

Where is it?

What are you raising?

What evidence do you have?

Notice what is missing.

No “BREAKING”.

No “MUST SEE”.

No “GAME CHANGING”.

No attempt to manufacture excitement.

The facts create the curiosity.

Ready to become one of our 100 Founding Members?

Subscribe now

4. Metrics Are More Persuasive Than Adjectives

One of the easiest ways to improve investor outreach is to remove adjectives and replace them with evidence.

Instead of:

Revolutionary fintech transforming SME lending

Try:

SME lending platform. $18m originated. 31% quarterly growth. Raising $5m.

The second email is less exciting in a traditional marketing sense.

It is also considerably more interesting to an investor.

Because investors can do something with numbers.

They can assess them.

They can compare them.

They can ask questions about them.

“Fast-growing” is an opinion.

“38% quarter-on-quarter growth for the past four quarters” is information.

This is especially important when you are cold emailing.

You have very little credibility at the start of the conversation.

You cannot assume the investor will take your claims at face value.

The easiest way to build credibility is to communicate like someone who expects to be scrutinised.

5. Do Not Make Investors Work To Decode Your Company

Another common mistake is trying to sound sophisticated.

A founder assumes the investor will be impressed by an unusual description of the company.

It sounds grand.

I still have no idea what you do.

Clarity is not unsophisticated.

It is respectful.

Investors read hundreds of opportunities.

They do not need another puzzle to solve before they understand whether something sits inside their investment strategy.

Your first email should make their job easier.

Not harder.

6. There Is A Difference Between Categorising And Shouting

There is one useful reason to use capitalisation in investor communication.

Structure.

For example:

RAISING: B2B SaaS. Seed. $1m. Singapore.

The capitalisation is acting like a label.

It tells the recipient what kind of message they are looking at.

That is very different from:

WORLD CHANGING AI PLATFORM YOU NEED TO SEE NOW

One provides navigation.

The other is marketing.

Investors often receive introductions from people they already know, so simple categories can actually make communication easier.

A trusted connector might have dozens of conversations moving at once.

A clear subject line helps them understand what they are forwarding without opening a spreadsheet or reading a paragraph.

Use formatting to organise information.

Do not use it to manufacture importance.

Subscribe now

7. Your Email Cannot Fix A Weak Proposition

This is probably the uncomfortable part.

Sometimes founders spend enormous amounts of time optimising outreach because they do not like the underlying answer.

The company may not have enough traction.

The market may not be compelling enough.

The positioning may be unclear.

The round may be too large for the current stage.

The investor may simply not be a fit.

Changing “seed round” to “exclusive investment opportunity” will not solve any of those problems.

Neither will adding CAPS.

Fundraising is difficult because investing is difficult.

You are asking someone to take risk based on incomplete information.

Your job is not to trick them into opening the email.

Your job is to give them enough signal to decide whether they should care.

That is a completely different mindset.

8. Make The First Email Easy To Forward

This is underrated.

An investor may not invest.

But they may know someone who should.

So write an email that can be forwarded without needing an explanation.

Something like:

That is enough.

There is no theatre.

No giant paragraph.

No attempt to sound like a press release.

No “I know your inbox is busy”.

No life story.

Just enough information for the recipient to decide what happens next.

9. Conclusion: Stop Optimising The Wrong Thing

There are no magic words that turn a poor investment opportunity into a great one.

A better subject line can help.

A clearer email can help.

A strong introduction can help enormously.

But none of them replace the fundamentals.

Know your numbers.

Know your market.

Know why this investor is relevant.

Explain the company clearly.

Make the email easy to process.

And stop CAPITALISING RANDOM WORDS because you think they will make someone pay attention.

The strongest fundraising emails usually feel almost boring.

That is the point.

They do not try to manufacture excitement.

They make the underlying opportunity interesting enough on its own.

Good investor outreach is not about shouting louder.

It is about giving the right person a reason to lean in.

Share

Continue Exploring the Frontier

If this piece resonated, you may want to go deeper.

This article is part of our Capital Raising collection, where we explore the ideas, frameworks, and strategies that help founders, investors, and operators make better decisions.

You can also explore our main topic categories to discover more insights across entrepreneurship, venture capital, fundraising, company building, and frontier technologies.

If you are serious about shaping the future rather than reacting to it, you are exactly where you should be.

WHY SUBSCRIBE | PREMIUM RESOURCES | ENTERPRISE PLAN | ADVERTISE

Frontier Deal Flow is a monthly curated database report within 22nd Century Frontier, connecting high-quality companies with active investors across frontier technologies and emerging markets.

This limited edition showcases the companies featured in the August 2026 issue, while preserving the signal and structure that make the report valuable.

Subscribe now

Table of Contents

1. Issue Snapshot

2. Featured Companies

3. Submit For The Next Issue

4. Access The Full Report

1. Issue Snapshot

The August 2026 Frontier Deal Flow issue features 12 companies across 7 countries.

Across all 2026 editions published so far, 75 companies have been showcased.

This month’s cohort brings together companies working at the intersection of AI, financial infrastructure, physical AI, agriculture, climate technology, advanced manufacturing, robotics, and other emerging fields.

By the numbers

12 companies featured

7 countries represented

Geographic mix:
North America 41.7% | Africa 33.3% | Europe 8.3% | Caribbean 8.3% | Oceania 8.3%

Stage distribution:
Pre-Seed 50.0% | Seed 41.7% | Stealth / Pre-Launch 8.3%

Leading themes:
AI & Machine Learning, AgTech & Food Systems, FinTech & InsurTech

AI exposure:
AI-linked companies represent 33.3% of the featured cohort

2. Featured Companies

The full version, available to paid subscribers, includes company contact details, downloadable pitch decks, investor signals, and additional fundraising information.

Below is the curated list of companies included in this public version.

Access Report: Public Version

3. Submit For The Next Issue

Founders who would like to be included in Frontier Deal Flow: September 2026, published on 1 October, can submit their company here:

Frontier Deal Flow Submission Form

Submissions are completely FREE.

4. Access The Full Report

The full version of Frontier Deal Flow includes:

• company contact details

• downloadable pitch decks

• full investor signals and metrics

To unlock the complete database and future issues, upgrade below.

Get 10% off forever

WHY SUBSCRIBE | PREMIUM RESOURCES | ENTERPRISE PLAN | ADVERTISE

The market is enormous.

Customers absolutely love the product.

The category is going to explode.

You are probably the most ambitious company in it.

That is part of pitching.

Founders are selling a future, not reporting the weather.

But there is a line that should not be crossed.

Do not invent investor interest.

Do not tell someone a fund is committed when it is not.

Do not turn a conversation into a commitment because you think it will create momentum.

That is not positioning.

That is a trust problem.

And trust is the one thing you really cannot afford to damage before someone invests.

Frontier Deal Flow Submission Form

Key takeaways

1. Social proof only works when it is real.

   Investor interest can create momentum, but inventing commitments can destroy credibility.

2. Separate opinion from fact.

   Be ambitious about the future, but be precise about numbers, customers, commitments, and who is actually investing.

3. One lie can contaminate the entire story.

   Once an investor catches one false claim, they may question everything else in the pitch.

4. Fundraising is the beginning of a relationship, not the end of a transaction.

   You may need the same investor for years, especially when things get difficult.

5. Create genuine momentum instead of manufacturing it.

   Strong founders do not need to borrow credibility. They make a compelling case and let the evidence do the work.

Table of Contents

1. Investors Ask Who Else Is In For A Reason

2. Social Proof Is Powerful. Manufactured Social Proof Is Dangerous

3. The Easiest Facts To Verify Are The Worst Ones To Lie About

4. One Invented Name Can Contaminate Everything Else

5. You Do Not Need To Reveal Names To Create Momentum

6. Your Investors Are Future Partners, Not Just Sources Of Capital

7. Investors Talk. More Than You Think

8. Be Persuasive About The Future. Be Precise About The Present

9. Conclusion: Never Risk A Ten-year Relationship For A Five-minute Advantage

1. Investors Ask Who Else Is In For A Reason

The question sounds casual.

It is not casual.

Investors are trying to understand the round, the level of competition, the credibility of the opportunity, and whether someone else has already done part of the work for them.

Good investor interest is a signal.

So founders naturally want to create more signal.

That is where things can go wrong.

There is a huge difference between saying:

“We have had strong conversations with several investors.”

and:

“Firm X is investing.”

The first describes reality.

The second creates a fact that can be checked.

That distinction matters more than most founders realise.

2. Social Proof Is Powerful. Manufactured Social Proof Is Dangerous

Founders are right to care about momentum.

A round with genuine interest from respected investors feels different from a round where nobody else wants to engage.

But there is a temptation to manufacture that feeling.

Perhaps a partner had one good meeting.

Perhaps an associate said they liked the company.

Perhaps an angel mentioned they might participate.

Perhaps someone said, “Keep me posted.”

None of those things mean that investor is in the round.

Turning interest into commitment may feel like a small adjustment in the moment.

It is not.

A sophisticated investor will often do a quick reference check on exactly the things you hoped they would simply accept.

They know the market.

They know other funds.

They know how venture firms make decisions.

And they know that founders under fundraising pressure can sometimes blur the edges.

Once that happens, the conversation changes.

You are no longer discussing your business.

You are discussing whether they can believe you.

That is a terrible trade.

3. The Easiest Facts To Verify Are The Worst Ones To Lie About

Some claims in a pitch are subjective.

Others are not.

This is where founders need discipline.

The more specific the claim, the greater the chance someone will verify it.

And investors are paid to verify things.

They will ask for the data room.

They will speak to customers.

They may call references.

They may know someone at the company you claim is a customer.

They may know the investor you casually named.

A pitch deck is not a safe place to hide facts.

It is often the exact opposite.

4. One Invented Name Can Contaminate Everything Else

Imagine a founder says that a well-known growth fund is joining the round.

That investor sounds credible, so another fund gets more interested.

A partner starts digging.

One message goes out.

“Are you actually investing in this company?”

The answer is no.

Maybe the fund only had an introductory call.

Maybe they passed three weeks ago.

Maybe they never even met the founder.

Now the issue is no longer whether the startup is interesting.

The issue is what else in the pitch was embellished.

Was the revenue number real?

Were the customers real?

Was the enterprise contract real?

Was the cap table accurate?

Did anyone actually offer a term sheet?

One questionable statement creates doubt around ten other statements that may have been completely true.

That is the hidden cost.

A founder does not just lose credibility on one claim.

They can lose credibility on the entire story.

5. You Do Not Need To Reveal Names To Create Momentum

Read more

Frontier Deal Flow is a monthly curated database report within 22nd Century Frontier, connecting high-quality companies with thousands of active investors, including angels, VC funds, family offices, institutional investors, and strategic partners.

It is designed to surface signal early and improve how capital is matched with emerging opportunities.

Subscribe now

Table of Contents

1. Issue Snapshot

2. What We Cover

3. How Access Works

4. Submit For The Next Issue

5. Access The Full Report

1. Issue Snapshot

The August 2026 Frontier Deal Flow issue features 12 companies across 7 countries.

Across all 2026 editions published so far, 75 companies have been showcased.

This month’s cohort brings together companies working at the intersection of AI, financial infrastructure, physical AI, agriculture, climate technology, advanced manufacturing, robotics, and other emerging fields.

A few of the companies featured in this issue are building:

• an AI-powered financial infrastructure platform helping banks generate more revenue from cards they have already issued

• physical AI systems designed to automate labour-intensive crop harvesting, sorting, and handling

• an offline-first data infrastructure layer combining IoT, AI, blockchain verification, and sovereign data governance for agriculture

• AI and robotics designed to reduce production lead times, material waste, carbon emissions, and labour dependency in apparel manufacturing

• a technology-driven ecosystem combining smart agriculture, renewable energy, tourism, manufacturing, and digital infrastructure across the Caribbean

• a new financial platform bringing fractional investing and diversified digital wealth tools to African markets

• an AI-powered portfolio platform for automated digital-asset management

• precision pollination technology using smart listening and proprietary AI to improve crop yields and biodiversity monitoring

• a new approach to restaurant takeout and delivery packaging backed by a patent-pending product concept

• a real-time digital layer designed to connect the physical world with digital experiences

• hemp-based construction materials designed as a lower-carbon alternative to conventional building components

• contract intelligence technology that transforms signed agreements into actionable operational data

…and more companies pushing the boundaries of frontier innovation.

By the numbers

12 companies featured

7 countries represented

Geographic mix:
North America 41.7% | Africa 33.3% | Europe 8.3% | Caribbean 8.3% | Oceania 8.3%

Stage distribution:
Pre-Seed 50.0% | Seed 41.7% | Stealth / Pre-Launch 8.3%

Leading themes:
AI & Machine Learning, AgTech & Food Systems, FinTech & InsurTech

AI exposure:
AI-linked companies represent 33.3% of the featured cohort

2. What We Cover

Each featured company includes a structured profile designed to help investors review opportunities quickly and efficiently.

Required fields

Company name
Website
Country
Sector
Stage
Contact information
Investment deck

Investor signals

Amount raising
Traction summary
Revenue or growth metrics
Previous investors
Fundraising deadline
One-line pitch

3. How Access Works

Frontier Deal Flow is shared in two formats.

1. Paid subscribers receive the full report, including:

company contact details

downloadable pitch decks

full investor signals and metrics

This version is available immediately below, giving investors time to review the companies and reach out directly to the ones they are interested in.

2. A limited version will be released two weeks later, and shared with the broader readership.

   This version will include the company list, but without contact details, decks, investor signals, or metrics.

The goal is to maintain strong signal for investors while still showcasing frontier innovation to the wider community.

4. Submit For The Next Issue

Founders who would like to be included in Frontier Deal Flow: September 2026, published on 1 October, can submit their company here:

Frontier Deal Flow Submission Form

Submissions are completely FREE.

5. Access The Full Report

Subscribe to unlock access to:

✅ All premium resources

✅ Full archive

✅ Future Frontier Deal Flow issues

And more.

Get 10% off forever

Unlock the full Frontier Deal Flow below 👇

Read more

Enterprise Members are companies supporting 22nd Century Frontier and actively building, investing, and operating at the intersection of technology, entrepreneurship, capital, and long-term value creation.

Enterprise Members

• EuphoriaTech Group is a London-based tech consortium uniting Ventures, Advisory, and Media to fuel innovation. Through venture building, strategy, acquisitions, and media, it empowers businesses and founders to shape the future.

Interested in joining the Enterprise Members program?

Learn more about the Enterprise Plan

Our May Most Loved Articles

Chosen by you. Ranked by reader engagement. Listed in reverse order.

6

Public Version by 22nd Century Frontier

5

The fundraising tactics that work when everyone already knows your name can be exactly the wrong move when nobody does

4

Investors can wait. Your startup cannot

3

Database Report by 22nd Century Frontier

2

Most founders build financial models to impress investors. The best founders build them to run better companies

1

The smartest founders don’t start with the largest round. They start with the most credible one

Subscribe now

Thank you

To every reader, paid and free subscriber, collaborator, and partner who spent time with us this month, thank you.

Your comments, shares, and trust are exactly what lets us keep producing original insight and useful resources.

We are currently in week 36 of 2026 (Q3).

Wishing you a productive September full of momentum, focus, and meaningful progress.

WHY SUBSCRIBE | PREMIUM RESOURCES | ENTERPRISE PLAN | ADVERTISE

Yet founders do it all the time.

A well-known entrepreneur announces they raised money with no pitch deck.

Someone else says they sent investors a three-page letter.

A famous founder raises on a single call.

Suddenly, a handful of early-stage founders are wondering whether the traditional fundraising process is dead.

It is not.

The problem is simple.

Famous founders operate with advantages that most founders do not have.

They can break the format because investors already know who they are.

You probably cannot.

At least not yet.

That does not mean you need to become boring.

It means you need to understand the difference between being distinctive and making your own fundraising process unnecessarily difficult.

Fundraising is not the product.

You are not trying to win an award for originality.

You are trying to get the right investors to understand your business, believe in the opportunity, and move quickly enough to write a cheque.

Frontier Deal Flow Submission Form

Key takeaways

1. Famous founders play by different rules because their reputation has already done part of the fundraising work.

2. If investors do not know you yet, clarity beats creativity.

   Make the opportunity easy to understand and share.

3. Do not introduce unnecessary friction.

   Investors are busy, and unusual formats can slow down an already difficult process.

4. Different is only valuable when it genuinely improves communication.

   Novelty alone will not get you funded.

5. Your fundraising process is not the product.

   Focus your creativity on building a company worth investing in.

Table of Contents

1. Famous Founders Are Not Raising From The Same Starting Line

2. Reputation Is A Fundraising Asset

3. Investors Are Busy. Do Not Make Them Work Harder

4. Different Is Only Useful When It Makes Something Better

5. The More Unknown You Are, The More Obvious You Should Be

6. Famous Founders Can Afford Experiments That You Cannot

7. Be Creative With Your Company, Not With Basic Fundraising Hygiene

8. Conclusion: You Can Break The Rules After You Understand Why They Exist

9. Final Thought

1. Famous Founders Are Not Raising From The Same Starting Line

When a successful founder starts another company, they are not introducing themselves from scratch.

Their previous investors know them.

Former employees may want to join them.

Customers may take the first meeting because of who they are.

Journalists already know the story.

Other investors are worried about missing the round.

That changes everything.

Imagine two founders.

One is raising their first £2 million for a new developer tools company.

The other previously built and sold a company, employed hundreds of people, and delivered meaningful returns to investors.

If the second founder sends a short email saying, “I’m working on something new. Here’s the thesis. Interested?”, investors may take the meeting immediately.

The first founder sends the same email and may hear nothing.

That is not unfair.

It is information asymmetry.

The famous founder has already spent years building credibility.

Their reputation is doing work before the fundraising materials even arrive.

You still need to do that work yourself.

2. Reputation Is A Fundraising Asset

Investors are making decisions under uncertainty.

They do not know whether your product will work.

They do not know whether the market will develop as expected.

They do not know whether you will handle a crisis well.

With a recognised founder, some of that uncertainty has already been reduced.

There is history.

References.

Previous outcomes.

People who have worked with them before.

For an unknown founder, the investor is building that picture in real time.

That is one reason your fundraising materials matter.

Your deck is not just there to explain the company.

It tells investors how you think.

How clearly you communicate.

Whether you understand your market.

Whether you can distinguish the important from the merely interesting.

A famous founder might get away with a cryptic five-slide presentation because everyone already knows the backstory.

If you do the same thing, an investor may simply conclude that you have not done the work.

There is a difference.

3. Investors Are Busy. Do Not Make Them Work Harder

This is where founders sometimes get confused.

They think doing something unusual will make them memorable.

Sometimes it does.

Often, it just creates friction.

An investor asks for a deck.

You send them a private website that requires a password.

Or a 17-minute video.

Or a 40-page document.

Or an interactive experience that only works properly on a laptop.

Congratulations.

You have made it harder to evaluate your company.

Investors have systems.

An analyst might review the initial material.

A partner may want a quick summary before taking a meeting.

Someone may need to circulate the opportunity internally.

Eventually, the investor will probably need to explain your business to people who have never met you.

A clear deck makes that easier.

That does not mean every startup needs the same template.

It means you should understand the job your fundraising materials need to do.

If an investor can quickly understand the problem, solution, market, traction, team, business model, and funding requirement, you are already helping the process move.

Do not confuse friction with sophistication.

4. Different Is Only Useful When It Makes Something Better

There is nothing magical about a pitch deck.

The point is not to worship PowerPoint.

The point is communication.

If you have a genuinely better way to communicate the opportunity, use it.

But be honest about whether it is actually better.

A founder building a highly visual consumer product might benefit from a product demonstration.

A technical infrastructure company may need an architecture document alongside its deck.

A biotech founder may need more scientific depth than a typical seed-stage presentation allows.

Fine.

Add what is useful.

But do not replace clarity with novelty.

A beautifully designed microsite will not rescue weak fundamentals.

An investment memo will not compensate for a confused strategy.

A cinematic fundraising video will not make poor unit economics disappear.

The best fundraising material is often less exciting than founders want it to be.

That is because its job is not to entertain.

Its job is to get the investor to the next conversation.

Ready to become one of our 100 Founding Members?

Subscribe now

5. The More Unknown You Are, The More Obvious You Should Be

Founders often worry about looking like everyone else.

That is the wrong concern.

Your company should be memorable.

Your fundraising process does not need to be.

If you are a first-time founder, the investor already has questions.

Why this market?

Why now?

Why you?

What evidence do you have?

How large could this become?

What happens if you raise the money?

Your materials should answer those questions as directly as possible.

Do not make an investor hunt for the point.

Do not hide traction halfway through a document because you want to “tell a story”.

Do not spend six slides explaining the history of the industry before telling anyone what you actually do.

Get to the point.

The opportunity is the interesting part.

Let that do the work.

6. Famous Founders Can Afford Experiments That You Cannot

There is another uncomfortable truth.

A successful founder can make a mistake in fundraising and still have options.

They may have wealthy friends.

Previous investors.

Former colleagues who want to back them.

Personal capital.

A large network of angels.

If a conventional VC process does not work, they may have five other routes to funding.

Most first-time founders do not.

That means the downside of experimentation is different.

If you have 18 months of runway and a large network waiting to fund whatever you build, feel free to experiment.

If you have four months of cash and this is your first institutional round, maybe do not gamble the company on whether investors appreciate your creative approach to fundraising.

There is a time to challenge convention.

Desperation is rarely that time.

7. Be Creative With Your Company, Not With Basic Fundraising Hygiene

There are plenty of areas where founders should be unconventional.

Product.

Distribution.

Pricing.

Customer acquisition.

Technology.

Fundraising hygiene is probably not the place to prove how rebellious you are.

Have a good deck.

Know your numbers.

Prepare a data room when appropriate.

Understand your cap table.

Know what you are raising and why.

Be able to explain how the money changes the trajectory of the business.

And make it easy for investors to move forward.

That is not boring.

That is competent.

You would be surprised how many founders lose momentum simply because they cannot answer basic questions quickly.

They spend weeks debating whether they should use a deck, memo, website, or video.

Meanwhile, the fundamentals are still unclear.

Solve the bigger problem.

8. Conclusion: You Can Break The Rules After You Understand Why They Exist

The lesson is not that founders should blindly follow convention.

Some conventions are outdated.

Some fundraising practices are inefficient.

Some investors genuinely prefer different formats.

But copying the behaviour of a famous founder without copying the advantages behind it is a mistake.

You see the tactic.

You do not always see the context.

That is a different game.

For most founders, especially first-time founders, fundraising is about reducing uncertainty.

Make the opportunity clear.

Make the information easy to consume.

Make the process easy to navigate.

Then let the quality of the company create the excitement.

Do not try to be memorable because your fundraising format is unusual.

Build something worth remembering.

9. Final Thought

The best fundraising tactic for most founders is not a clever format.

It is making a strong business easy to understand.

You can invent new rules later.

First, give investors a reason to care enough to let you break the old ones.

Share

Continue Exploring the Frontier

If this piece resonated, you may want to go deeper.

This article is part of our Capital Raising collection, where we explore the ideas, frameworks, and strategies that help founders, investors, and operators make better decisions.

You can also explore our main topic categories to discover more insights across entrepreneurship, venture capital, fundraising, company building, and frontier technologies.

If you are serious about shaping the future rather than reacting to it, you are exactly where you should be.

WHY SUBSCRIBE | PREMIUM RESOURCES | ENTERPRISE PLAN | ADVERTISE

You need capital to accelerate the business.

But to convince investors to give you that capital, they want evidence that the business is already moving.

So while you are building the pitch deck, taking investor calls, answering diligence questions and updating your financial model, someone still needs to acquire customers, improve the product, hire people and hit the next milestone.

That someone is usually you.

The mistake is treating fundraising as a temporary pause from building the company.

It should be the opposite.

A strong fundraise is happening alongside a business that is getting harder to ignore.

Frontier Deal Flow Submission Form

Key Takeaways

1. Fundraising is not a pause button.

   Your company needs to keep moving while you are talking to investors.

2. Traction is stronger than promises.

   Real customers, usage, revenue, retention, and measurable progress give investors evidence they can underwrite.

3. Investors can afford to wait. Founders usually cannot.

   Use every week of the raise to make the business harder to ignore.

4. Focus on progress, not activity.

   More meetings, press, partnerships, and pitch decks mean little if the underlying business is not improving.

5. The best fundraise creates momentum, not dependence.

   Prepare before you start, keep building during the process, and make every investor update about what has changed.

Ready to become one of our 100 Founding Members?

Subscribe now

Table of Contents

1. Investors Have The Luxury Of Waiting

2. Traction Gives Investors Something Better Than A Pitch

3. The Best Update Is Not That Fundraising Is Going Well

4. Do Not Confuse Activity With Traction

5. Fundraising Should Expose Momentum, Not Manufacture It

6. Prepare Before You Start The Clock

7. The Company Should Keep Getting Better While The Deck Gets Older

8. Protect The Business From The Fundraising Machine

9. Conclusion: Build Something Investors Have To Chase

1. Investors Have The Luxury Of Waiting

The founder has a clock.

The investor usually does not.

That difference matters.

If you have six months of runway and need to raise before the bank balance becomes uncomfortable, every week feels important.

An investor can look at your company today and decide to wait another month.

They may want to see whether customer retention improves.

Whether the enterprise pipeline converts.

Whether the product launch actually works.

Whether another investor leads the round.

From their perspective, waiting produces information.

From yours, waiting burns runway.

This is why fundraising creates a strange psychological trap.

The more desperately you need the round, the more attractive it becomes to spend every waking hour trying to close it.

But investors are often looking for the opposite signal.

They want to see a founder who is raising because capital will accelerate something that is already working, not because the business has stopped and needs rescuing.

2. Traction Gives Investors Something Better Than A Pitch

A pitch tells investors what you believe will happen.

Traction tells them what is already happening.

That distinction is enormous.

This is why progress during a fundraise matters so much.

Every meaningful milestone removes one more question.

You did not know whether customers would pay.

Now they do.

You did not know whether they would stay.

Now retention data is emerging.

You did not know whether the sales process could repeat.

Now several customers have come through the same channel.

You are gradually replacing assumptions with evidence.

That is what investors are buying into.

3. The Best Update Is Not That Fundraising Is Going Well

Founders sometimes spend too much time updating investors on the fundraising process itself.

“We have spoken to 37 investors.”

“Three are interested.”

“We have two second meetings.”

“We’re expecting term sheets soon.”

That may be useful context, but it is not the most compelling reason to keep an investor engaged.

The more interesting update is:

“We signed our largest customer.”

Or:

“Activation increased from 31% to 47% after changing onboarding.”

Or:

“We launched in Germany and acquired our first 100 customers without paid advertising.”

Those updates change the conversation.

They give an investor a reason to revisit their previous assessment.

This is particularly important for investors who like the company but are not ready to commit. They may not need another reminder about your round.

They need a reason to change their mind.

Progress gives them one.

4. Do Not Confuse Activity With Traction

Read more

Frontier Deal Flow is a monthly curated database report within 22nd Century Frontier, connecting high-quality companies with active investors across frontier technologies and emerging markets.

This limited edition showcases the companies featured in the July 2026 issue, while preserving the signal and structure that make the report valuable.

Subscribe now

Table of Contents

1. Issue Snapshot

2. Featured Companies

3. Submit For The Next Issue

4. Access The Full Report

1. Issue Snapshot

The July 2026 Frontier Deal Flow issue features 9 companies across 6 countries.

Across the 2026 editions published so far, Frontier Deal Flow has showcased 63 companies, highlighting founders building the next generation of frontier technologies and emerging market solutions.

This month’s cohort is led by Pre-Seed companies, alongside Stealth / Pre-Launch, Seed, and Growth businesses tackling challenges across artificial intelligence, climate technology, fintech, enterprise software, intelligent mobility, healthtech, education, and clean energy.

By the numbers

9 companies featured

6 countries represented

Geographic mix:
Europe 44.4% | North America 22.2% | Africa 22.2% | Asia 11.1%

Most common stages:
Pre-Seed
(Stealth / Pre-Launch 22.2% | Pre-Seed 55.6% | Seed 11.1% | Other 11.1%)

Sector leaders:
AI & Machine Learning, ClimateTech, FinTech & InsurTech, Enterprise Software

AI exposure:
AI-linked companies represent 55.6% of the featured cohort.

2. Featured Companies

The full version, available to paid subscribers, includes company contact details, downloadable pitch decks, investor signals, and additional fundraising information.

Below is the curated list of companies included in this public version.

Access Report: Public Version

3. Submit For The Next Issue

Founders who would like to be included in Frontier Deal Flow: August 2026, published on 1 September, can submit their company here:

Frontier Deal Flow Submission Form

Submissions are completely FREE.

4. Access The Full Report

The full version of Frontier Deal Flow includes:

• company contact details

• downloadable pitch decks

• full investor signals and metrics

To unlock the complete database and future issues, upgrade below.

Get 10% off forever

WHY SUBSCRIBE | PREMIUM RESOURCES | ENTERPRISE PLAN | ADVERTISE

Too often, the fundraising number is chosen backwards.

Someone looks at comparable rounds.

Someone hears another startup raised $4 million.

Someone assumes more cash equals more credibility.

It rarely works that way.

Investors are not funding a number.

They are funding a sequence of milestones that reduce risk.

If your raise is disconnected from those milestones, the amount starts to look arbitrary, regardless of how good the pitch is.

The strongest fundraising strategies begin with execution, not ambition.

Frontier Deal Flow Submission Form

Key Takeaways

1. Your raise should be driven by milestones, not wishful thinking.

2. Investors back momentum more readily than oversized plans.

3. A smaller, credible target can unlock a larger round later.

4. Every fundraising number tells a story about how you think as a founder.

5. The goal is not to raise the most capital. It is to create the most options.

6. Investors Invest In Confidence, Not Certainty

Ready to become one of our 100 Founding Members?

Subscribe now

Table of Contents

1. Build Your Raise Around Milestones, Not Maximum Spend

2. Why Investors Often Increase Conviction Before They Increase Capital

3. Leave Room For Upside Without Looking Unprepared

4. Bigger Rounds Create Bigger Expectations

5. Your Fundraising Strategy Should Evolve During The Process

6. Investors Invest In Confidence, Not Certainty

7. Conclusion: Raise Enough To Create Your Next Advantage

1. Build Your Raise Around Milestones, Not Maximum Spend

Imagine two SaaS founders.

Founder A wants to raise $5 million because they believe international expansion sounds exciting.

Founder B wants to raise enough capital to reach $3 million ARR, improve retention by 25%, and demonstrate repeatable customer acquisition before expanding internationally.

Both companies may ultimately require similar amounts of capital.

Only one has made it obvious why the money matters.

Investors rarely invest because someone has a long shopping list.

They invest because each dollar has a measurable purpose.

The question is never:

“How much could we spend?”

The better question is:

“How much capital gets us to a materially stronger company?”

That distinction changes the conversation entirely.

2. Why Investors Often Increase Conviction Before They Increase Capital

One misconception founders have is believing that asking for less automatically means thinking smaller.

It doesn’t.

In many cases, it signals discipline.

Suppose a climate technology startup is seeking funding to commercialize a new battery material.

Rather than presenting a five-year global rollout, the founders explain exactly how one funding round will finance pilot manufacturing, third-party validation, and commercial agreements with two industrial customers.

Those milestones dramatically reduce technical and commercial risk.

If investors become convinced those goals are achievable, something interesting often happens.

The conversation shifts naturally.

Instead of debating whether the company needs more money, investors begin asking what additional progress could be achieved with additional capital.

That is a very different discussion from trying to justify a larger raise from day one.

Momentum creates opportunity.

Oversized ambition often creates skepticism.

3. Leave Room For Upside Without Looking Unprepared

The best fundraising strategies include flexibility.

Not because founders are uncertain.

Because markets are.

Some rounds move faster than expected.

Some investors want larger ownership positions.

Some strategic investors can introduce customers, talent, or follow-on capital that fundamentally changes the opportunity.

If that happens, founders should already understand how additional capital would accelerate execution.

Notice the word accelerate.

Not change.

Your business should not depend on suddenly discovering a new strategy simply because someone offers more money.

Additional capital should increase speed, expand capacity, or shorten time to market.

It should not completely rewrite the roadmap.

That distinction gives investors confidence that management remains disciplined regardless of cheque size.

4. Bigger Rounds Create Bigger Expectations

One truth many first-time founders underestimate is that every dollar raised creates future obligations.

Larger rounds usually mean:

• higher growth expectations

• more demanding reporting

• stronger governance

• increased hiring pressure

• greater scrutiny from future investors

Capital solves problems.

It also creates them.

A founder who raises significantly more than the business can productively deploy often discovers that investor expectations begin growing faster than the company itself.

That can lead to rushed hiring.

Premature expansion.

Higher burn.

And difficult conversations twelve months later.

More money only helps when the organisation is capable of converting capital into execution.

Otherwise, it simply magnifies inefficiency.

Subscribe now

5. Your Fundraising Strategy Should Evolve During The Process

Many founders assume the fundraising plan is fixed the moment the deck is finished.

It should not be.

Fundraising is a discovery process.

Early investor meetings often reveal:

• recurring concerns

• stronger market positioning

• unexpected customer demand

• different pricing assumptions

• new strategic introductions

The best founders use these conversations to sharpen their thinking.

Not to reinvent the company every week.

But to improve clarity.

As conviction grows, the fundraising strategy should become more precise, not more complicated.

Flexibility is a strength.

Indecision is not.

Knowing the difference matters.

6. Investors Invest In Confidence, Not Certainty

One of the biggest myths in fundraising is that investors expect founders to predict the future.

They don’t.

Experienced investors know forecasts change.

Markets move.

Competitors appear.

Products evolve.

What they are really evaluating is whether the founder understands the assumptions behind the numbers.

Can you explain why eighteen months of runway makes sense?

Can you defend your hiring plan?

Can you identify which milestones matter most if the market slows?

Confidence comes from thoughtful preparation.

Not perfect prediction.

That is why founders who know exactly why they are raising often outperform founders who simply know how much they want.

7. Conclusion: Raise Enough To Create Your Next Advantage

The purpose of fundraising is not to maximise capital.

It is to maximise progress.

The strongest founders think in milestones.

They understand what success looks like eighteen months from now and build the raise around reaching that point with confidence.

Sometimes that means raising less than you hoped.

Sometimes investors encourage you to think bigger because they believe the opportunity justifies it.

Both outcomes are healthy.

What matters is that the number follows the strategy, not the other way around.

Capital is fuel.

Milestones are direction.

Confuse the two, and you can end up with a full tank and no clear destination.

Share

Continue Exploring the Frontier

If this piece resonated, you may want to go deeper.

This article is part of our Capital Raising collection, where we explore the ideas, frameworks, and strategies that help founders, investors, and operators make better decisions.

You can also explore our main topic categories to discover more insights across entrepreneurship, venture capital, fundraising, company building, and frontier technologies.

If you are serious about shaping the future rather than reacting to it, you are exactly where you should be.

WHY SUBSCRIBE | PREMIUM RESOURCES | ENTERPRISE PLAN | ADVERTISE